Circumstantial evidence
In law, circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. It differs from evidence provided by a witness who directly saw or heard something of an alleged offence; instead it is the circumstances that surround facts that can be used to infer guilt or innocence through reasoning.
An example of circumstantial evidence is the behaviour of a person around the time of an alleged offense. If someone were charged with theft of money, and were then seen in a shopping spree purchasing expensive items, the shopping spree might be regarded as circumstantial evidence of the individual's guilt.
A popular misconception is that circumstantial evidence is less valid or less important than direct evidence. This is only partly true: direct evidence is generally considered more powerful, but successful criminal prosecutions often rely largely on circmstantial evidence, and civil charges are frequently based on circumstantial or indirect evidence. Much of the evidence against Timothy McVeigh was circumstantial, for example. Speaking about McVeigh's trial, University of Michigan law professor Robert Precht said, "Circumstantial evidence can be, and often is much more powerful than direct evidence."
External Links
Michigan Daily article: http://www.pub.umich.edu/daily/1997/jun/06-04-97/news/news3.html
Referenced By
Evidence | Law topics | List of legal topics
|
